Chemical Hair Straightener: Potential Payouts
Hair Straightener Potential Payouts
A continued deep dive into Chemical Hair Relaxer Lawsuits from Legalcalls.com by Attorney Jeff Keiser.
Estimating potential settlement amounts in the hair straightener litigation involves analyzing comparable product liability cases where plaintiffs alleged health issues due to consumer products.
As of December 2024, the hair relaxer litigation is ongoing, with no finalized settlements or verdicts. However, based on similar product liability cases and current legal analyses, potential settlement amounts for individual cases may vary significantly, influenced by factors such as the type and severity of illness, duration of product use, and associated economic and non-economic damages.
Estimated Settlement Ranges:
- Uterine Cancer Cases: Due to strong scientific evidence linking hair relaxer use to uterine cancer, these cases are anticipated to be in the top settlement tier. Potential settlement amounts are estimated between $300,000 and $1.75 million, depending on individual circumstances.
- Ovarian Cancer Cases: With studies indicating a 50% increased risk of ovarian cancer among hair relaxer users, settlements for these cases might range from $400,000 to $750,000.
- Uterine Fibroids Cases: Although less severe than cancer, uterine fibroids can cause significant pain and may require surgery. Estimated settlements for these cases range from $150,000 to $500,000.
- Endometriosis Cases: Given the challenges in proving causation and the condition’s non-life-threatening nature, settlements may range from $110,000 to $300,000.
It’s important to note that these are estimated ranges based on similar litigations and current analyses. Actual settlement amounts will depend on the specifics of each case and the outcomes of ongoing legal proceedings. Some of the cases we considered were:
The plaintiffs in these lawsuits are not just statistics; they are individuals with deeply personal stories of how hair relaxers have impacted their lives. For many, these products were introduced in childhood, often viewed as essential for a polished and professional look.
- Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Litigation
- Allegations: Plaintiffs claimed that prolonged use of talcum powder products led to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.
- Outcome: Johnson & Johnson proposed a settlement of approximately $6.48 billion over 25 years to resolve these claims.
- Average Individual Payout: Estimates suggest that individual settlements could average around $330,000 per claimant, though amounts may vary based on factors like illness severity and medical expenses.
- Roundup Weed Killer Litigation
- Allegations: Users alleged that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- Outcome: Bayer AG, the manufacturer, agreed to a settlement of up to $10.9 billion to resolve existing and potential future claims.
- Average Individual Payout: Lawyers estimate payouts between $5,000 and $250,000, with an average settlement amount around $150,000 per plaintiff.
- Zantac (Ranitidine) Litigation
- Allegations: Claims centered on the presence of a probable human carcinogen, NDMA, in Zantac, allegedly leading to various cancers.
- Outcome: GSK settled the majority of U.S. lawsuits for $2.2 billion.
- Average Individual Payout: Specific average payout information is not publicly disclosed, but individual settlements likely vary based on factors such as the severity of illness and duration of medication use.
- Essure Birth Control Device Litigation
- Allegations: The device was linked to severe complications, including organ perforation and chronic pain.
- Outcome: Bayer settled with approximately 39,000 claimants for $1.6 billion.
- Average Individual Payout: While exact figures are not publicly available, dividing the total settlement by the number of claimants suggests an average payout in the range of $40,000 per claimant, subject to individual case specifics.
These cases provide a framework for estimating potential settlement amounts in the hair straightener litigation, considering factors such as the number of claimants, severity of alleged injuries, and strength of scientific evidence linking product use to health risks. Of course, these estimates are just that – estimates – and it will take time to determine any actual settlement amounts. No two cases are the same, and facts and the law will determine how the hair straightener cases play out.
*Advertisement
The Legal Calls Advantage – how we’re different
Here’s why clients love our legal intake service:
- We know what really matters to you is the cost per compensable case.
- Our fraud detection department is second to none.
- Need medical records? Just ask.
- Non-incentivized intake agents! Most case originators pay a bonus to their agents on signing, which leads to signing unqualified claimants.
- We conduct in-depth interviews by asking open-ended non-leading questions, like an attorney would do.
To learn more visit our mass tort intake page
Craig H. Alinder, Vice President